FAA Reforms Will Benefit General Aviation Community

Published by #ModernSkies

In an effort to derail the AIRR Act, advocates for the status quo would have you believe that the legislation would harm America’s valued general aviation community.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

Modernizing the air traffic control infrastructure would help general aviators by providing a greater margin of safety and efficiency. Since most general aviation facilities in this country exist in smaller communities, outside of major airports, the current infrastructure often lags behind their big-city counterparts. The AIRR Act would free ATC managers from the Byzantine procurement rules of the FAA and introduce innovations that will improve the level of service for many in the general aviation sector.

Finally, some have tried to scare general aviators into believing this new system will cost them money. The truth is that noncommercial fliers will be exempt from the user fees under the AIRR Act and will continue to fund airport improvements the same way they always have via fuel taxes.

As the general aviation community continues to examine the AIRR Act, they will discover just how much it will benefit them and support America’s culture of flying.


ATC Reform Can Ensure a System that’s Resilient?

Posted by #ModernSkies

In September 2014, one man wreaked havoc on the skies over the Midwest when he cut sensitive cables and set fire inside a suburban Chicago air traffic control operations facility. At that point, the lives of the passengers and crew in 135 jets were in critical danger. Here’s what the Chicago Tribune said about the extent of the damage caused by a disgruntled telecommunications contractor for the FAA:

“Among the new disclosures was that Howard cut cables at precisely the most sensitive spot, knocking out the backup telecommunications system in addition to the primary one. Radars went black. The automated handoff system to transfer control of planes to other facilities was down. Even ground-to-ground communications were wiped out.

“What followed was a controlled panic, as FAA controllers used cell phones and other backup devices to ground planes and turn back hundreds of others about to enter Chicago’s airspace. The contingency plan worked — no planes were lost and no one was reported injured. But severe damage had been done.

“‘There has never been an outage of the resulting magnitude like the outage (Howard) caused by attacking the Chicago Center,’ prosecutors said in asking a federal judge to sentence him next month to 13 years in prison.”

The Chicago Center houses equipment that “provides critical voice and data communications that support air traffic operations at FAA facilities nationwide,” according to an investigation conducted by the Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Transportation. For two weeks following the fire, thousands of flights in and out of O’Hare and Midway airports were delayed or canceled. American, Southwest and United airlines have hubs in Chicago, which is the nation’s third busiest airspace, and aviation stakeholders reported a loss of more than $350 million.

The IG’s report provided 24 essential recommendations and noted, “The damage to Chicago Center highlighted weakness in FAA’s current air traffic control infrastructure, which has limited flexibility to respond to system failures and facilitate the return to normal operations.” This situation is a powerful argument in favor of ATC reform for efficiency and to maximize safety. Ten years and $6 billion ago, the FAA began efforts to modernize the Air TrafficControl (ATC) system through NextGen, but we’re still waiting for that to fully come online. When the unthinkable happens – system failure, sabotage, terrorism – a resilient system is absolutely necessary. What we need to do is restructure ATC under a not-for-profit entity, removing this 24/7 technology and service provider from the political and financial pressures of the federal budget cycle. This is how we will ensure the reliable funding needed to make the technological transformations.

Thoughtful Commentary vs. Willful Distortions

Crain’s New York Business has recently been a hotbed of writings between advocates for restructuring air traffic control and those who defend the busted status quo. In mid-December, executives from American, JetBlue, Southwest and United airlines penned a thoughtful commentary on how restructuring ATC would relieve congestion in the skies over New York City. Noting that New York’s airports are “consistently ranked among the nation’s top-five most-delayed airports for years,” they urged adoption of a modernized system to be overseen by an independent, not-for-profit organization. Stating that obvious that such a switch will present challenges, they made the trenchant point that “doing nothing is certain to perpetuate a flawed system that is increasingly frustrating and costly both to airlines and our passengers.”